Home » Fred Meyer Design » Recent Articles:

Environmental Review for Fred Meyer’s Greenwood Expansion

Fred Meyer Greenwood Expansion Plans

Fred Meyer Greenwood Expansion Plans


Thursday, March 11 is the next public comment on the environmental impact of Fred Meyer’s Greenwood expansion. This is an important project for our community and many have voiced concern on the impact to the peat bog.

Make sure to attend this meeting if possible and we’ll be sharing our coverage with the neighborhood.

MEETING DETAILS:
Thursday, March 11, 2010 at 7:00 p.m. at the Loyal Heights Community Center, Room 2, 2101 Northwest 77th Street.

Written and/or oral comments may be submitted at the meeting.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Upzoning in Greenwood: How it can impact your home’s value.

Upzoning in Greenwood:  How it can impact your home’s value.

Greenwood Rezone

Greenwood Rezone


Around 35 Greenwood neighbors showed up to the Greenwood Library on Tuesday night to discuss a new zoning proposal for the neighborhood’s urban core. Although the Greenwood Community Council has no power to change zoning on its own, it serves as liaison between Greenwood residents and the City Council. GCC president (and, currently, sole board member — contact him via the GCC website if you’d like to get involved!) Trevor Stanley emphasized the importance of getting input from the neighborhood before talking to City Council members.
The proposed rezoning plan would upzone the entire area around the planned Fred Meyer development project in Greenwood’s urban core, including some single-family houses that border the current Fred Meyer lot. Upzoning would mean taller buildings and more potential to bring new developers to the area, but it would also mean that those single-family dwellings could be replaced by Ballard-style townhouses.

Some neighbors expressed concerns that an upzone could also mean increased property taxes for residents who chose not to sell their lots to developers. Barbara L. Shale, of the King County Tax Advisory Office, addresse the issue by explaining that a jump from single-family to L3 zoning — L3 is the low-rise zone most commonly occupied by clusters of townhomes — wouldn’t increase anyone’s taxes overnight. She said that the value of a house often goes down when the value of the land itself goes up, and that taxes would likely stay about the same until the next physical property inspection of the area, in 2015 or 2016.

Although most of the debate was about the “buffer” of single-family homes, neighbors were also concerned about upzoning the commercial lots at the core of the Fred Meyer development. Proposed changes would allow buildings that currently top out at 40 feet to be raised to 65 feet. Although this is obviously attractive to developers, Stanley made it clear that the Advisory Group behind the zoning proposal was thinking about the future growth of Greenwood, not about Fred Meyer.

Fred Meyer’s plans for a new shopping center don’t actually include or require any zoning changes.
“I’m going to sorely miss Greenwood Market,” Stanley said, “but that’s not something [the GCC] have any control over. That’s not something we’re trying to have control over.”

The neighbors at the meeting felt they hadn’t been given enough time or information to make a decision about the new changes, so they unanimously passed Resolution 2. That resolution opposes the changes “at this time,” and urges the City Council to “demonstrate community support for [future changes] and the notify those impacted by the change.”

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Design Review Board approves plans for Greenwood Fred Meyer

Fred Meyer’s plan for a massive expansion of its Greenwood store got the stamp of approval from the Design Review Board at Ballard High School on Monday night. The Board heard a mixed bag of comments from around 100 neighborhood residents, but no overwhelming consensus about any particular design change the neighborhood would like to see. In fact, the new design for the 160,000 sq. ft. store, with 680 parking spaces and 200 apartment units, seemed to address a lot of the issues that came up previous public meetings.

All in all, the DRB meeting was less eventful than people following the situation might have expected. The group from Fred Meyer opened their presentation by trying to reassure the audience that they’re committed to the community, but the opposition they seemed to be expecting never turned up. Although there were a handful of constructive suggestions to improve the design — better bike access, more entrances to the store, space for a farmers’ market or other local event — nobody was up in arms about any particular element of the proposal.

As Fred Meyer’s Real Estate Director, Tom Gibbons, pointed out at the beginning of the meeting, the design has come a long way since the company proposed a generic big box store back in 1997. Fred Meyer is in no hurry to return to the previous two-story version of the new store. Pushing an “urban village” model appeals to the community, but it’s also motivated by profits. The project’s designers acknowledged that the foot traffic generated by an open, walkable space with retail storefronts and kiosks is going to make or break the store in Greenwood.

Now that the plans for the building include sinking it as far into the ground as Greenwood’s peat bog will allow. The bog is a still a concern for some residents. Former Greenwood Community Council president Kate Martin showed up with a map of the bog, and used it to illustrate the point that water is always going to travel in and out of the area, and Fred Meyer is building at its own risk. In response to other neighbors’ concerns about the bog and the depth of the building, the Board assured everyone that the peat had been thoroughly studied, and that the building wouldn’t be approved if it was too low to meet code.

Several people felt that new building needed more parking, especially with 200 apartment units and new retail that could attract a lot more cars to the area. The Board shut these comments down, though, because parking isn’t a design issue, except that the code requires a minimum number of spaces. The 680 proposed spaces for Fred Meyer meet code, but there’s nothing from adding more if it turns out to be necessary.

For a play-by-play of the meeting, check out phinneyridge.org’s liveblog from Monday night.

Update: A Seattle attorney criticizes - point by point – the city’s design review process and it’s result on the Fred Meyer Greenwood project, sub-optimization of result.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Fred Meyer Greenwood Design Survey Results

Fred Meyer Greenwood Design Survey Results

As the Design Review Board approved the Fred Meyer Greenwood Design with comments from the audience, our survey showed the public roughly 57% supporting the project to 43% opposed. Some great comments from the survey are listed below:

Survey Quotes:
Why do I support the project? Because it has financial backing and will happen. GG.DDAG dreams of mix use development on this site are nice but unsustainable.

Combining the store and grocery makes sense, since they’re both already Kroger and shopping all together is convenient, and the current set up is pretty ugly (but I hope the combo would retain the local feel of Greenwood Market as well as good organics and bulk sections). But the neighborhood does not need 300 new apartments. Traffic is bad enough already, and new condo projects all over town are sitting incomplete with no buyers. A quick Craigslist search comes up with 285 apt listings with keyword Greenwood.

We don’t need a superstore in a small retail area.

Megastores are an abomination.

Can’t wait for this project to happen! We need a decent, low-price grocery in this area and to in-fill around Greenwood to build a better neighborhood.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Live Updates – Fred Meyer Greenwood Design Meeting

Live Updates – Fred Meyer Greenwood Design Meeting

22.28

Comments:

If parking will be used for employees, customers, and tenants of apartments. When people come home from work at 5pm IT WILL BE PEAK TIME FOR PARKING PRESSURE. Board notes it is not a design issue, cuts off question. Apartments get no assigned parking??? No answer / not a design question.

I work in retail! No one will want to walk from parking garage to the shops in front – it is opposite ends of the development. Why is the parking garage so far from the small retailers?

I applaud the increase in density and walkability. How long is the lease? Sixty years.

I challenge the DRB to think with the 60 year mindset and environmental carbon reductions.

I predict less parking will be needed in future. Multi-generational facility – how are you planning for kids to play? Sustainability needs to be via integrated design. Process is ignoring heart of design issues: peat. Peat is being studied, and 2 meetings with rgo technical experts held. Bottom line is they cannot disturb the peat. They cannot disturb the water flow to the peat. Must build above the peat.

Parking is determined a minimum level by code. Some people want more parking, others want less. There is a tension around parking. It is costly to build, but we assess the impacts.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

22.22

Audience Comments:

Does the plan adequately address parking for shoppers, employees, and housing. Code dictates this.

Are apartments looking down at the parking lot? Yes.

Seattle Design Review Board Greenwood

Seattle Design Review Board Greenwood

Please make apartments livable, not just boxes.

Please put a glass covered area for the short term parking.

Thank you for the improvements of design – the 4 quadrants and multiple entries are great. I don’t like the 2 story option for the store, I agree with FM. Customers don’t go to 2nd story, even in NYC. Site plan maximizes housing on site. I emphasize these points:

Stormwater planning
Garage design
Current vacancies already on 85th – that retail will be hard to fill.

What about bicycles? People may / should come by bike. Does this design plan for bike access in a smart way and bike parking?

There are great things in this design. East-west: east side stairs – needs ramp (raised by our site in early discussions). North-south needs a strong pedestrian space also. Well defined for pedestrians.

Sinking the store is a brilliant idea and an extraordinary idea you wouldn’t find elsewhere. I oppose the 2 story store option it is a bad idea.

I shop in the area today – leaving 87th closed is a bad idea. Too much traffic is forced onto 1st ave.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

22.14

Public Comment continues:

“Stoops” are for apartments, not townhomes – not 2 story townhomes. I like multi-story townhome units better. It is a more “homey” look.

How will smaller retailers on 85th get their deliveries / service entires? There is no parking on 85th. Developer seems confused / can’t answer. Deliveries would need to be made within the site.

The road through the middle of the development (north / south) – is that how cars enter from 85th? Yes. Commenter notes there will be a lot of cars, busy streets. They should add another entrance on 87th.

I live nearby – I can see greenwood market from my house. I am concerned about 86th being used more intensively. Single lane for cars, tough already to walk… Who will plan to improve sidewalks on 85th? There is gravel in some places between 3rd ave and 8th ave. You want people to walk on that gravel? There are no sidewalks on 86th and it is a very narrow street. It is a single lane street – 2 cars can’t pass today. Don’t turn my street into a thoroughfare!!! I agree 1st avenue will be very crowded. It’s a little 2 lane street today with no sidewalks. Traffic troubles are coming. Put entrances on 87th. I like the open bog area today – I’m happy they are building a park there. Parking garage will hurt feel of park – no sidewalks on 87th either between 1st and greenwood.

Board should watch design of garage carefully. I was in architecture school – you shouldn’t rely on landscape to make building look nice. Garage needs to look nice without the landscaping added. I question the use of green screens to mitigate design flaws. You should add solar panels to roof. Crossroads should be the gym, not the leasing center. Put the leasing center in the retail spaces.

Are stoplights proposed at 85th and 2nd? How does a pedestrian go from the big parking garage, how do I get into the FM store? Either elevator next to loading dock or other choice. I don’t like the parking garage entry.

Is the project LEED certified; LEED silver, what level of LEED? Go extra mile to get to silver or gold.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

22.01

Kate comments continue:
This is the heart of our urban village – we can do better than 1 story retail on 85th. Essential planning issues:

Bog is a big risk; water movement through bog. Do something that doesn’t let them get away from having to raise up building when peat / water issues discovered. Needs to happen in early guidance. If housing is not built – it will be an ugly, bare lid rooftop – huge risk.

How can we understand engineering of bog? You blocked comments at last meeting. I want to have public meeting on bog. Design is better, what about stormwater? Could drainage be exposed like “straight edge alternatives” where broadview / C street is exposed and gorgeous, lush, green. A corridor could be more than a pathway.

3rd is already a very busy street – trucks would come in on this street in plan. 87th north of site is same width as 3rd. Why is 87th a “neighborhood” street? 3rd street may be blocked by truck traffic. Please move the entrance to 87th.

Where are there ramps? Which entrances don’t require stairs? All stairs have a ramp or elevator, except…. not the north entrance on 87th / “thicket”. West portal has a ramp. I want more wheelchair ADA / stroller access!!!

All parking is shared between stores and apartments all the time. The Fred Meyer parking does not close. I see the peat bog as a major design issue.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

21.53

Public Comment Begins – 7:42pm – If time elapses, Tom / DPD planner can take comments.

I live at 87th and 1st. I am relieved to see the thicket. Glad it won’t be higher to block light. Open area – could it be used for a farmer’s market on 1st at the plaza? Could a farmer’s market be held at the plaza, i’d like to see that. I don’t believe FM truly offers local markets – hence the farmer’s market need. We are the largest offering of organic items in portland – we plan to add to greenwood. Commenter disputes this response from fm.

Commenter states planning is very important – should be done before design. I’m a planner and designer. Here is how I see it from a macro level: I have the bog map (appears to be Kate Martin, Greenwood Community Council) – as a planner, last thing anyone would ever do is put a building on the bog. Showing map of peat on site up to 8 foot on site. At safeway on 87th and greenwood – it looks like it isn’t in the bog. The water moves to the greenwood bowl from every direction. It’s a huge risk to show us only projects with the store underground. It’s incredibly unlikely the building could go down to the planned levels. You can’t pump groundwater in this area. “Analyze first and design later.”

Design sells the consumers short – if you can’t sell on 2 levels – you need to learn merchandising. “Jack that thing up!” Our green street has been relegated to a parking garage entry. We want to acquire the nearby land for a pocket park to teach how a bog functions. You are using it as a retention pond. It’s not a retention pond! We are designing to make it a pocket park.

Please put townhomes on the edge at 87th so it is a neighborhood, not just a parking garage near the planned park.

Accessibility: I’m 51 years old and won’t walk forever. My family has disabilities. This plan is an ASSAULT on accessibility. No way to get up 40 stairs!!! Streets should be all at grade and accessible so that people can grow old. A two story store would solve much of this.

Used bookstores, coffee shops, etc. should be intended for the retail areas. Housing is “dead dead dead”.

Sidewalks, curb ramps – sidewalks should be raised like U-Village and cars need to use a sidewalk as a speed bump. Why should pedestrians step down?

We should be creating a connection to urban village of crown village.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

21.42

Board Questions continue:

What is access from 87th?

Why did you use “parcel 3″?
We have lease to 2011 with a 10 year option. Couldn’t come to agreement on land value

Fred Meyer Design Review Board Questions

Fred Meyer Design Review Board Questions

Design Review Board - Fred Meyer

Design Review Board - Fred Meyer

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

21.38

How wide is space between buildings on 85th? – It is 20 feet. Garden center is near residences, and then near Piper Commons steps.

Sidewalks – Slides were different than design book. Developer apologizes for glitches in packet – slides are accurate.

Do townhomes continue to face 87th? Developer states they believe residents did not want trees removed?
Could townhomes face 87th? Developer not pursuing – not feasible for security and management of apartments. Anything possible however.

Is the only bridge the 1 proposed between 2 apartment buildings? Would other buildings be separated; would they have elevators? Yes: just one bridge – other 2 story buildings have no elevators. Note that elevators go down into store also – seeking to limit them.

Security – would any parts of site be open 24/7? What are planned operation hours?
Developer – We’re not sure; we know it needs to be controlled – to be determined…. it will NOT be open 24/7.

What is the vehicle access from 85th? Yes, FM customers would use this access from 85th to enter the garage for FM store.The east – west movement is encouraged for pedestrians only – not vehicles.

Can you go through options, and explain which parking is for residential and which parking is for retail customers (note PhinneyRidge.org has previously raised this issue with the developer!) – Developer: – Reviews different options and how parking would differ a,b,c – we note they only plan to pursue the preferred option as emphasize at all discussions.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

21.28

7:19 – More over-detailed analysis of sidewalks. Joke on shrubs over-growing sidewalk.

50 minutes elapsed – questions and comments begin now. Board questions:
DESIGN BOARD RESPONSE:
Board expressing thanks, noting number of changes.

What happened to access from the south or west? We asked for this at last meeting, why were no changes made?
Developer: Stairs and elavators took room; store needs storage room for stocking and prep.
Board: Noting they considered more access, but declined to provide.

Would there be retail at Southwest corner? – Yes.

Same depth of retail was used in all options shown. Depth of retail was 30 feet from store; 45 feet on 85th.

Would 3rd avenue access – would bridge over top be an essential or optional part of housing plan? – Helps on feasibility, portal type experience, eyes on street / space. Housing SW corner is 3 stories of housing above the retail. Allows the housing to be elavator accessible. Three stories is not reasonable for a “walk up” apartments. It’s an “L” shaped building and the bridge is the only break.

In middle of site at 4 corners, would you…. – Leasing is 365 days per year, it is a commercial enterprise. Workout rooms, kitchens, would be at that location similar to apartment complexes. Needs to be shut down when the store is closed (likely for safety).

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

21.19

7:09 – Could be “urban hardware” and lighting that could change during year.
3rd avenue northwest – near single family homes – driver for design. 86th gives “geometry” for design by mapping across site for “east west connection”.
“West Portal’: “West facing is “great”…” Tactal way to catch sun. Clearly this guy is the designer of the group who does the “artsy stuff”. 3rd avenue includes stoops and yards to abutt the residential use. welcoming stair and “bridge-like” element to link residential buildings. This would be a public accessible place, but not late at night. Comparison to Harbor Steps in downtown Seattle.

7:12 – On 87th is the North edge. Designer calls it the “thicket” – feel free to suggest a different one… Coniferous trees will remain and set character. Trees wil be featured on abutted parking structure. Parking structure would have plants along wall too. “green factor provisions”. Actual tree locations shown on diagram.

Middle of site is FOUR CORNERS – a residential “expression” mixing hardscape and landscape.

Sidewalks – developer will show how they can make them better. Existing sidewalks are sure ugly. Showing NW 85th street and a 10 foot sidewalk, with busy street on side of it. Sidewalks increased to 15 feet – retail fronts it and also buffers fred meyer store from 85th. “Walkable profile” – trees every 30 to 40 feet.

1st Ave NW – Very old yellow van shown in photo – accidental? Whose special van is this?

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

21.09

7:00pm – Design options that are not preferred being presented – obviously no intent to pursue these options.

7:01pm – Two story isn’t economic – Fred Meyer won’t pursue. Too much cost, too much theft, too much labor costs. Fred Meyer via Tom state they won’t be pursued. Fallback strategy would be to remodel the existing store only into a grocery store. Would demolish greenwood market or put to a non-competing use. Fred Meyer has been in town for 35 years. Crowd asking “is this a threat???”

Next speaker – 7:04pm – Current site is difficult to navigate as pedestrians or on bikes. New rights of way, abilities to connect to the city grid.

Piper Commons: Hypothetical name… This is the plaza at the Fred Meyer entry. Outdoor “sales” area for seasonal variation – ie when Fred Meyer stores place outside plants, fruits, etc. at today’s existing stores. Showing transition from highest point of site down to 86th street connection. Showing view of storefront from 86th – it’s meant to evoke Pike Place Market. This is the terminus of Morrow Lane into plaza entry for fm store.

85th – a busy street – main entry for vehicles coming to store – “gateway” – “Piper Gateway”. This foot traffic will benefit nearby retailers.
DSC_0108

DSC_0107

Fred Meyer is pulled back 30 feet from existing property line.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

20.59

Fred Meyer Developer Lorig Protest

Fred Meyer Developer Lorig Protest

Attempting to stop the protest of Lorig

Attempting to stop the protest of Lorig

Greenwood Fred Meyer - Protest of Developer

Greenwood Fred Meyer - Protest of Developer

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

20.56

DSC_0106

DSC_0104

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

20.54

Continued design response:

Trees: Trees will screen 87th street homes similar to existing foilage.

Housing mass on top of garage: all housing moved off of parking garage, moved to south one-third of site, concentrated at 3rd and 85th.

Design board forcing questions to be held until presentation is complete. Questioner closed.
Design perceived as having access and permeability through the site. Continuous retail along 85th to provide visibility to retail. Will tenants really lease this retail property? (presenter laughs)

Front stoops and doorways off the street on 3rd.
Vehicle access:
All vehicle access eliminated on 87th. Alley will be widened and used for trucks, and then will exit on 1st avenue. Autos will enter to garage via 1st ave and other entries.

Departures will include from parking garage on 1st avenue.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

20.48

No rezoning planned. Remain at C1-40. No rezoning requested for surrounding areas.
Summarizing the design main points:
200 apartments; 160k Fred Meyer store; 680 parking stalls; 25k retail space for other stores per our preview story on Friday.

Emphasizes a 16 foot slope on property. Let’s design put Fred Meyer store to only five foot above grade at 85th, which is lowest point.

All of the housing is on the roof of Fred Meyer. Plaza at store entry remains.

Neighborhood influences: Bus route on 85th; 3rd ave is a minor arterial. 1st avenue is a connection to open spaces and a “green street”.

Backbone to design is a new connection from 2nd avenue to 86th.

Prior board comments – how they handled:

Cross-site connections: tying 86th across site and alignent of 2nd avenue on roof of Fred Meyer store allowing pedestrian and vehicle access.

Multiple entry points: site needs to be easily accessible. Four points shown as access for vehicles or pedestrians

Store Entry separation – one entry off plaza and another 250 feet away near parking garage.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

20.43

Design Board Introduction: Things that can block an approved design: Illegal, Without authority in the design guidelines
Design board is private volunteers – wishes them “luck”. Big room – easily 50-75 attendees. Library all chairs are full.

Tom Gibbons – Real Estate director for Fred Meyer gives a brief intro and introducing other speakers. His points:
• Listing donations to community organizations including Phinney Neighborhood Association
• Health benefits are extended to part time employees.
• Estimate creating 200 new jobs and doubling the employees currently in the store.
• Estimated sales tax revenue increase of $1.4M.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

20.28

A group of protesters is speaking impromptu at the meeting as they are protesting what they believe to be discrimination against a African-American receptionist (”Patricia”) at the developer’s business (Lorig) from never being promoted and then replaced. The developer – Bruce Lorig – was shocked at the impromptu protest at the meeting and asked to discuss the issue with the former employee.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

16.32

First test update.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

We are planning to provide live updates of the September 28th Fred Meyer design meeting from Ballard High School Library.

6:34: The board members introduce themselves and promise up to 3 hours to get through public comments. Reminder: Design issues only, no environmental issues. The board has no say over those.

6:35: Tom Gibbons, Fred Meyer’s Real Estate Director, is relating the history of the plan for Greenwood.

Gibbons talking about Fred Meyer’s community involvement and local employees. Promises 200 new jobs.

6:40: Architects are up now. Site won’t be rezoned. It’s staying C1-40, which has a 40ft height max. 200 apartments on the roof of the new Fred Meyer, 680 parking spaces. Pedestrian access over the roof. Now showing off pedestrian and vehicle access points.

6:48: The plan has been revised to set the garage back to preserve trees that were a concern at previous meeting. Garage is now 2 stories, with parking on roof. Residential that was on top of the garage has been moved

6:50: Vehicle access has been moved off of 87th. Truck access will be through widened alley on 1st Ave.

6:52: Three options. Fred Meyer wants Option A. Larger apartments, one-story retail facing 85th, ground-level residential parking with plaza access. Two-story garage with parking on lid. Kiosks and standalone retail near entrance.

6:55: Option B.

7:27: 3G reception is working in the room again. The architects are answering questions from the board about increasing the number of access points to the Fred Meyer store. It couldn’t be done because the site had to be lowered, and stairs or elevators would be required.

Board seems to want even more retail.

Question about the garden center: it’s on the ground level and isn’t an access point to the store.

Fred Meyer Greenwood Development – Design Update

Fred Meyer Greenwood Development – Design Update

Fred Meyer Greenwood Design

Fred Meyer Greenwood Design


The Fred Meyer Greenwood development is one of the major stories of community interest to both the Greenwood, Phinney Ridge, and surrounding neighborhoods. Community feedback regarding pedestrian access, urban design, vehicle access, traffic, environmental protections, and handicap access have led discussion at extremely active previous community meetings. On behalf of Fred Meyer stores, we interviewed Bruce Lorig and the development team regarding the modified proposal for the Greenwood Market and Fred Meyer combined sites to understand how they had responded to the community’s feedback thus far. You can view the full detailed proposal at this Greenwood Market – Fred Meyer Development link. This report is all of the information shared by the development team in anticipation of the community’s feedback on Monday at the Ballard Library. The development team provided one preferred option to focus on in the review, although 3 options were drafted.

The major design element is that the Fred Meyer store will occupy a primarily underground space, with only four feet of the height of the store appearing above ground. The store will be approx 15 ft underground on the 85th St side, although the 5ft that is above ground will not actually “appear” because it will be wrapped with retail and housing. The full 20 ft of store height will be visible from 1st Ave, and from the proposed extension of Morrow Lane. What this means is that top or “lid” can be divided with housing units and retail facing 85th – so that pedestrians can walk throughout the housing grid. It does mean that the “lid” is at a height from the street ranging from 20 feet on 1st avenue to 6 feet on 3rd Avenue which requires a ramp, elevator, or stairs to reach that level of the development. There are a good variety of ways to walk through the housing development (approximately 200 rental housing apartments) and small retail spaces (25,000 square feet in total) that are above ground.

Vehicle Access Design Changes:
Vehicle access is proposed on 1st avenue at two ground level points, 3rd avenue for the lower level, and via 85th street through the rough center division of the housing area. This is intended to respond to community feedback that entry from 87th street would be destructive to the home environment for houses on 87th and nearby.

Pedestrian Access Design Changes:
Pedestrians may enter on all four sides of the development: on 87th, 1st Avenue, 3rd Avenue, and 85th. This is intended to respond to community feedback that the 160,000+ square foot Fred Meyer for Greenwood would block movement through the development lot. It remains that there is no access near the 85th Street bus stop. The main entrance to the Fred Meyer store will be via 1st Avenue through a pedestrian plaza. You can also enter the store via the parking lot in the rear, from a set of stairs.

Height and Scale:
The development will mix heights ranging from four stories at the 85th Street frontage to the lowest levels at the back of the development’s parking lot. The parking area which will be buffered by trees was focused towards the back of the development at 87th to protect the integrity of housing on that street. Housing was eliminated on top of the parking garage as part of the design changes from the previous community meeting.

Space Alignment with Neighborhood:
The housing units / apartments on the above-ground lid of the Fred Meyer Greenwood store are split into streets so that pedestrians and vehicles can pass through. There are a number of ways to move through the development via a grid, although it is not perfectly aligned to the existing street grid. Morrow Lane will also extend through the development to allow vehicles to pass fully through the alleyway (with parking spaces alongside) between 1st and 3rd Avenues.

Environmental Impacts / Peat Bog Risks
Community members have raised issues regarding the environmental impacts of the peat bog in the area. The developer noted that there are stricter environmental regulations in place today, versus the rules from when Safeway developed nearby. Many believe that the Safeway store had severe negative impacts on the peat bog in the area, by blocking water flow through the peat. This may have caused damage / settling to nearby housing due to changes in soil density. The developer noted their priority to understand the water flow through the building site today, and to ensure that the curent water table (which is 1-2 feet below the store’s planned level) needs to maintain water flow. The existing Fred Meyer and Greenwood Market are alredy built on top of peat, and how this development impacted the peat bog (upon its original construction) is unknown, prior to the current peat bog regulations being developed. The developer has set up numerous monitoring wells and soil logs on the site and is continuing to study the soil hydrology.

The current Fred Meyer and Greenwood Market stores are leased on an “air rights lease” from Greenwood Shopping Center, Inc. The lease for the Greenwood Market expires in 2011, and they have chosen not to renew at the current lease rates. The leases are written as 20 year leases with 5 year extension options.

This area of Greenwood has been designated as an Urban Village, with a goal of concentrating density in the area, convenient to major transit links. The planned site developer – Lorig – has developed over 2,500 apartments in the Seattle area, much of which is focused on student housing. This includes development of Thorton Place, Pike Place Market, and Ujimaya.

The Fred Meyer store is planned to be appproximately 160,000 square feet in a one story plan. Fred Meyer’s other stores (including Redmond) have demonstrated that a second story for the Fred Meyer stores both have much lower sales (by as much as half) and much higher maintenance costs to deliver goods to the 2nd story. The company has determined that a 2 story Fred Meyer at Greenwood is not an economic option to pursue.

Only four feet of the store will be above ground, with the remaining 16 feet below ground, depending on the side of the development that you are facing. The full 20 foot height of the building will be visible, above grade on 1st Avenue. The focus of the new plan is to allow multiple routes for vehicles to enter and multiple routes for pedestrians to pass through the housing grid. In addition – the design works to avoid impacts to the housing on 87th Street. Fred Meyer will also feature a seperate Garden Center with plants and gardening supplies near the small business retail area (above ground) which will have a “sunlight” roof to allow light to pass through to the plants.

Another big change was to eliminate the previously planned housing on top of the parking garage. Now the parking garage remains at the rear of the property – with two stories of parking and a top (3rd floor) for 3 total areas for stacked parking. Note that parking will be shared for the apartment tenants, and the store’s customers. There are 700 parking spaces planned — keeping in mind that we would estimate at least 200+ spaces to be filled by the apartment tenants. The intent here is some alternation of tenants heading to work versus Fred Meyer shoppers, and the store eventually closing. We could see some demand competing for these parking spaces and the average family tenant may have more than one car.

Lorig noted there is no rezoning required by their analysis for the current design of the Fred Meyer complex, named “Piper Village West” after the current Piper Village housing adjacent to the site. The current relatively narrow sidewalks on 85th would also be widened. Where the housing borders the street, a 15 foot setback will be planned that leverages a landscaped berm to buffer pedestrians and traffic from the apartments.

There is currently over 500,000 square feet of retail space in the Greenwood area, and a moderate degree of both vacancies, renovation, and out-of-date / uneconomic retail in the area by the developer’s analysis. The size of the Fred Meyer planned is very similar to the retailer’s presence in Ballard and other Seattle neighborhoods. The independent retail section is now continuous along the 85th street heavy traffic corridor for visibility of these businesses.The independent retailers would have 3 stories of housing atop their stores to make maximum denisty use of the land.

We wanted the community and surrounding Greenwood neighbors to be aware of the proposed changes and will continue to update the story with additional detail as it breaks.

Click Here to take survey

The Greater Greenwood Design Advisory Group has proposed in June 2009 that the proposed development be rezoned to Neighborhood Commericial. The detailed Fred Meyer Greenwood Design rezoning proposal can be found from the link which includes a number of drawings for the alternate vision of the site.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Fred Meyer Greenwood Seattle Expansion – Community Discussion

Fred Meyer Greenwood Seattle Expansion – Community Discussion
Fred Meyer Greenwood Expansion?

Fred Meyer Greenwood Expansion?


We are eager to continue participating in the upcoming community discussion on Monday, September 28th at Ballard High School Library. Based on past meetings of the design review board – it is sure to be a busy and lively meeting with a ton of community debate.

We are neither a proponent nor objector to the Greenwood Fred Meyer expansion in Seattle. That said – there are two sides to every story, and wanted to share what Fred Meyer has to say. In general, we’ve found the company to be a reasonable asset for communities and ethical in employment and business practices.

Any time a long loved neighborhood market is threatened – there is a very reasonable amount of concern regarding changes and how it will impact parking and traffic in the neighborhood. When we stopped in some neighborhood locally owned stores – right across from the development site on Greenwood – we were shocked to find a very low level of awareness of the potential changes with other neighborhood merchants. We’ll continue sharing viewpoints on all sides of the issues – it’s a big change for Greenwood / Phinney and a story all local residents need to consider.

The FAQ below is offered by Fred Meyer on their position – we don’t agree or disagree with it, but hope to spark good discussion on the project for the Greenwood and Phinney Ridge Seattle communities. The text is Fred Meyer’s unedited FAQ that we are sharing and look forward to an active discussion on the potential design options. It also offers direct contacts within Fred Meyer to share concerns or support.

Greenwood Market - Future Fred Meyer?

Greenwood Market - Future Fred Meyer?

Project Overview per Fred Meyer:

The current Greenwood Fred Meyer, built in 1975, is being replaced with a 170,000 square-foot sustainably-designed store that will provide expanded product offerings, a full-service grocery, and a new, updated and more enjoyable shopping experience. In addition to eco-friendly features, the new store will also offer one of Seattle’s largest selections of organic products (Northwest-sourced whenever possible).
The current preferred design option includes approximately 200 apartments―some above the store and others at street level along the east side of 3rd Avenue NW. Approximately 20,000 square feet of additional retail space will be leased out to small, unique retailers and restaurants that will be located along 85th St. and 1st Avenue next to new, wider, landscaped sidewalks. A public plaza at the intersection of 1st Avenue and Morrow Lane can be used by the community for gatherings and events. These new neighborhood elements will contribute to the transformation of Greenwood’s town center into a vibrant, high density, walkable urban village.
Location: The north side of NW 85th Street between 1st and 3rd Avenues NW

Construction Start Date: Fall 2011 (Pending approvals and permitting) / Completion Date: 2013

Project Cost: Fred Meyer will invest about $50 million in the store and other retail; Lorig will invest another $27 million in the residential portions
Green Building Certification: Targeting Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) certification standards

How does the new Fred Meyer fit into existing neighborhood and city plans for growth in the area?

The property currently occupied by Fred Meyer and the Greenwood Market has long been designated as an urban village by the Greenwood neighborhood and the City of Seattle. An urban village is categorized as high density, highly pedestrian-friendly and a place where people can live, work and play. This is what the neighborhood and the City have envisioned for Greenwood’s town center. Fred Meyer’s plan to incorporate apartments, other small retailers, and the focus on pedestrian activity will help the neighborhood move closer to realizing this vision. Although the zoning of the property would allow a traditional “big box” format with a single-story store and extensive surface parking, we are meeting the community’s request to incorporate a residential component and other smaller retail stores, and are thus designing to meet NC3 type provisions.
When will construction start? How long will it take?

We are planning to start construction in fall 2011 or early 2012. Construction will take approximately 18-22 months.

Will the new development create more congestion and traffic problems?

We know that to be successful we need to make sure our store is safe and easy to get in and out of, and that traffic congestion is mitigated. As part of the permitting process, we will hire a consultant to do a complete traffic study of the project. This will help us understand the traffic impacts of the development and what we’ll need to do to mitigate any additional traffic, as well as improve the experience for all users of the development and the surrounding neighborhoods.

Additionally, it is important to note that Fred Meyer is not a regional draw, but rather typically attracts customers from only 1-3 miles around each store. The amount of increased traffic congestion seen with a large-scale warehouse retailer, for instance, is not characteristic of Fred Meyer stores. And, we believe the net new traffic to the site will be negligible. The only addition to the store is grocery, which will replace the current grocery trips already taking place on the site.

Are there plans for construction mitigation in the area?

We will address construction mitigation as part of the Master Use Permit review process. Routes for truck access, adjustment to transit stops, hours of construction, and sidewalk and street parking closures will be planned well in advance and communicated to the neighborhood.

Will the development affect Greenwood’s peat bog?

Fred Meyer has hired a consultant specifically to identify and address any impact to the underlying peat in the area. Like the Piper Village project next door, issues surrounding the peat have informed much of the project’s design, and efforts have been made to ensure that there is no detrimental impact on the peat.
We will also ensure that contractors follow best practices throughout construction and operate in compliance with the City of Seattle’s new peat ordinance.
Has Fred Meyer involved the local community in planning the new development?

Fred Meyer, Greenwood Shopping Center and Lorig are committed to building a project that the community enjoys, appreciates, and uses. Since 2003, we have met over 50 times with Greenwood community leaders and members of the local planning committees, as well as city officials, to discuss the project. Through these meetings, we have received input and guidance from our neighbors and understand their vision for Greenwood. We have incorporated key components of their feedback and priorities into our plans, and continue to work collaboratively with them to achieve an end result that benefits everyone. We are grateful to work with a neighborhood that is involved and able to articulate their desires; it has prompted us to develop a store that is unlike any other Fred Meyer.

What will happen to the Greenwood Market?

We recognize that the Greenwood Market has been an important part of the community. But the neighborhood’s own plans for growth and revitalization inevitably bring change. The engine for the desired change is the Fred Meyer redevelopment. It is the catalyst that will allow the property to be redeveloped and move Greenwood toward the dense, pedestrian-oriented urban village that we all want.

The Greenwood Fred Meyer store is the only one without food in the Seattle market and offering a full-scale grocery store is central to Fred Meyer’s plan for success. The Greenwood Market would need to enlarge its own store in order to remain economically viable, but there is not enough space for both stores to be enlarged. The Greenwood Market’s lease expires in 2011 and they have been making alternative plans for their future for several years. The store’s owners, Town & Country Markets, will continue providing groceries at their store in Ballard, and at their sister store, Central Market, in Shoreline. Although we understand that change is not easy, we are confident that the much bigger grocery offering at the new Fred Meyer (including a large selection of organics, as well as a convenient and large take-out deli) will provide much to please the neighborhood.

What about the employees at the Greenwood Market?

We know there is concern about the employees at the Greenwood Market. Fred Meyer has been informed that all of the Greenwood Market employees will be offered the opportunity to transfer to other Seattle locations within the Market system. However, for those employees who would prefer to remain in the Greenwood neighborhood, we will offer priority consideration at the new store. We are proud to offer excellent salaries and one of the best benefit packages in retail (including health care) to our employees.

What businesses will occupy the other retail spaces?

Currently no leases have been signed, but the vision of Fred Meyer, Greenwood Shopping Center and Lorig is that the small retail spaces will be occupied with unique, locally-owned and operated, high-quality shops and restaurants.
Who do I contact to answer questions about the project?

Tom Gibbons, Fred Meyer Director of Real Estate Development

503-797-3533

Tom.Gibbons@fredmeyer.com

Melinda Merrill, Fred Meyer Director of Public Affairs

503-797-3830

Melinda.Merrill@fredmeyer.com

To view the site, go to 100 NW 85th St, Seattle WA

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Subscription Options:

Recent Comments

  • Slow Loris: Stick a fork in the Zoo Society. The City should cancel the ...
  • Bill Farmer: Seattle Parks has created a webpage for the Greenwood-Phinne...
  • c. river: Will there be parking? I don't usually advocate for parking ...
  • riverbluff: Wasn't this formerly a garage/filling station? How much clea...
  • Amalala: I'm still digging on tearing down the old McDonalds building...

Phinney Ridge News

Phinney Council Needs You

March 5, 2010

Phinney Council Needs You

We are seeking 3 new board members for PRCC, and our meetings are the first Tuesday of the month at 7:30 p.m., open to all, and we invite everyone to come to discuss neighborhood projects, events, needs, politics, give us an educational talk, share ideas and get to know more neighbors.
The PRCC boundaries are Aurora [...]

Fred Meyer Greenwood Expansion – March Public Review Scheduled

March 5, 2010

Fred Meyer Greenwood Expansion – March Public Review Scheduled

Seattle’s Department of Planning and Development (DPD) is holding a public meeting to gather comments on the Fred Meyer project in the Town Center. This meeting is focused on information relating to soils and hydrology issues and to receive comment on other environmental issues.
A geotechnical report has been submitted by the developer which identifies [...]

Upzoning in Greenwood: How it can impact your home’s value.

February 24, 2010

Upzoning in Greenwood:  How it can impact your home’s value.

Around 35 Greenwood neighbors showed up to the Greenwood Library on Tuesday night to discuss a new zoning proposal for the neighborhood’s urban core. Although the Greenwood Community Council has no power to change zoning on its own, it serves as liaison between Greenwood residents and the City Council. GCC president (and, currently, sole board [...]

Seattle’s Taproot Theatre Roars back to Life.

February 7, 2010

Seattle’s Taproot Theatre Roars back to Life.

Fall in Seattle was a sad season, with the unbelievable realization that an arsonist had destroyed one of the Greenwood / Phinney Ridge most beloved cultural institutions. The arson devestation to neighborhood businesses and the Taproot theatre was both shocking and sobering.
Winter is a new season, and like a sparkling cover of fresh snow, [...]

Tree Risk Complaints at the Zoo

January 14, 2010

Tree Risk Complaints at the Zoo

As the Woodland Park Zoo expands its West Entry, near Phinney Ave. and 55th St., some Seattle residents are concerned about what the new, improved gate is displacing: trees. The construction project required the removal of 14 trees, according to local arborist and tree advocate Michael Oxman.
Oxman has been keeping an eye on [...]